I couldn’t have discovered Chomsky at a more appropriate time. I have just read the ebook of “Understanding Power: The Indispensable Chomsky”, which presents his views on a great variety of subjects in a Q&A format. There is really a vast amount of literature by and about him on such topics as politics, society and activism, waiting to be explored, which I am sure would offer unique insights and reliable information on just how the world today is being run by those wielding all the powers. All of it can be extremely depressing and can very easily inject a sense of despair and pessimism into anyone wishing for a more just and egalitarian society, were it not for Chomsky’s supreme confidence in the impact of and strong advocacy for organizing and activism – not at all misplaced when we hear him reveal the small yet substantial successes achieved by activists and resistance movements in recent years.
Chomsky is arguably the most brilliant mind at work today. It would be unfair to put him in the category of intellectuals, for from Chomsky’s own criticism of the intelligentsia, it is very clear today that the so-called intellectuals mostly possess no conscience and no independent mind and are merely elites and propagandists sub serving the political and business class. When we imagine the dangers that are inherent (and in fact, which have been playing out in reality for over a century now) in this whole phenomenon of the intelligentsia - meaning people from universities and scientific communities - aiding and abetting the concentration of power in a few hands and subjugation of the general population, it is a great relief to listen to someone like Chomsky. One can only wish he was listened to more, and by more people. Atleast for me, his efforts and activism undoes the hollow and ultimately sinister work of most of the intellectual community.
It is difficult to not see sense in anything that Chomsky says. With his amazing ability to collect, distill and articulate information, he can tear apart something like the entire fabric of
So you read all his criticisms and his revelations such as how the elite and powerful have been using the media to ‘manufacture consent’ among the public to find support for their indefensible and reprehensible actions both home and abroad, and there is a fair chance one might ask, “So has this guy got anything constructive to say?” I got my answers before I had time to ask and that is where Chomsky appeals to me the most. He harbors a rightful skepticism for ideologies (he considers Marxism, Leninism etc akin to other organized religions) and one cannot agree with him more when Chomsky says we must be wary of anyone brandishing an immediate and ready made solution for all our current problems. That is a lesson from history that could be missed only at our own peril; the scourges of Communism and Fascism all arose as not very different versions.
I have always been attracted by the ideas of Gandhi (I call him “Mahatma”) and Thoreau, so it was a wonderful coincidence for me to find Chomsky an anarchist. As refreshing as it is to hear Chomsky clear away the popular misconceptions about socialism and democracy, he presents a very practical approach to activism and resistance, never going gung-ho about an anarchist future but always careful to point to institutional rather than individual failures and the need to not overlook piecemeal but important social changes that can be brought about by popular struggles within the current authoritarian framework.
To call Chomsky a hero is to wrong him, for he is ever at pains to emphasize that the real work is always done by people who forever remain in the background – spreading awareness, raising funds, distributing pamphlets, organizing people and so on – and the leaders often merely use the platform so painstakingly built by such people. It touches me profoundly, as a young man with a lot of ambitions who somehow happen to have this rather nice vision of being a mass leader and creating a harmonious society at the stroke of a pen. I guess leadership is dangerous, because power can corrupt even the best and being an anarchist demands a general skepticsim of all authority. Once again, such consistency in views and self-conduct over a long and illustrious activist career is what sets Chomsky apart. Inspiration is never difficult to find, one can always go to a Vivekananda or the Mahatma; but Chomsky makes it difficult for anyone with a conscience to not act; to listen to him (and use our own reasoning to verify his views) is to stand up, totally convinced of an urgency and responsibility to act, and believe in and work for change.
